Guidance for the thermoforming process | CompositesWorld

A briefing on some of the common foam core material types, forming methods and tooling requirements.

Creep (top), vacuum forming (middle) and compression molding (bottom) processes.

Thermoforming rigid foam core sheets has been on my radar lately, spurred by questions from an Abaris client about forming polymethacrylimide (PMI) core. After doing a little research on PMI materials, we found answers and provided solutions to the customer. Then we decided to gather data on other universally used foam core materials for our own internal use. Some of what we learned is shared here.

Rigid foam core sheets can be tricky to thermoform because these products tend to have an extremely low heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and high insulation (R) values. These properties are affected by changes in foam density and material thickness. The higher the density, the longer it takes to get to temperature and the higher the pressure needed to form it. Moreover, when the thickness is too great, the material cannot be heated uniformly through the cross-section, making it less suitable for forming. For these reasons, forming is typically limited to sheets that are ≤25.4-millimeters (1.0-inch) thick. Any thicker than that may require casting/molding to the desired shape, machining from thicker block stock, or choosing another core material option. Also, as a rule, the minimum inside bend radius for thermoforming is two times the core thickness (e.g., 25.4-millimeter (1-inch) core thickness requires a 50.8-millimeter (2-inch) inside radius).

Closed-cell foam sheets are susceptible to moisture uptake. Lower density foam cores typically absorb more water than the higher density cores, as the area of the surface cells are greater (larger surface void size). Most manufacturers recommend a drying process prior to forming and controlled storage afterwards, before layup or bonding. In addition, some core materials need thermal conditioning to minimize outgassing — especially after a machining process. Conditioning the foam greatly reduces chemical activity at the surface that may otherwise negatively react with the resin or adhesive used to bond the core in the next operation.

Not all foam core materials are formable; however, most manufacturers specify which products can be formed and which cannot. Datasheets are available for selected formulas that list physical, mechanical and thermal properties — these are necessary for developing a sound thermoforming process. The ideal forming temperature for each type of core is slightly above the glass transition temperature (Tg) and significantly below the melt temperature (Tm).

Airex (PVC and PET) core materials are thermoformable and have a range of core types, densities, and processing temperatures as shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Thermoforming temperatures for Airex core. Source | Abaris Training Resources Inc.

Last-A-Foam (PU) FR-4300 series core is listed in the manufacturer’s product selector as the company’s preferred thermoformable formula. Core types, densities and processing temperatures are found in Table 2.

Table 2. Thermoforming temperatures for Last-A-Foam FR-4300 series core. Source | Abaris Training Resources Inc.

Rohacell (PMI) foam core materials are all thermoformable. Core types, densities and processing temperatures are found in Table 3.

Table 3. Thermoforming temperatures for Rohacell foam core. Source | Abaris Training Resources Inc.

Figure 1. This method uses weights to form the core into a mold as it is heated in an oven. Source | Airex Processing Guidelines

This method uses sandbags (or similar weighting methods) on top of a sheet of core spanning across a female mold, which is then placed in an oven and heated to the forming temperature and later, cooled with the weights in place (Fig. 1). This method can also be adapted to use a matched mold setup with a base tool and a weighted upper tool.

Figure 2. This method uses a flexible vacuum bag to form the core into the mold after it is heated in an oven or autoclave. Source | Airex Processing Guidelines

Vacuum forming can be done in an oven or autoclave using a vacuum bag as an inside flexible membrane (Fig. 2). A layer of lightweight, stretchable, breather material is used to sandwich the core inside the bag and provides both a breather path and a slip surface between the tool and core. Heat to the forming temperature prior to applying full vacuum and apply autoclave pressure if applicable for thicker or higher density materials.

Reconfigurable/adaptable mold technologies have been developed by Adapa (Aalborg, Denmark), Curve Works (Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands) and bespline (Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada) that provide additional vacuum forming options for thermoforming foam cores. They achieve production of complex, curved structures without the waste or time associated with traditional one-off molds, using a digitally reconfigurable table that transforms according to a CAD file in minutes. These molds are thermoforming single- and double-curved foam panels and kits, which are used, for example, to produce the interior lobby for Dubai’s Museum of the Future and by production boatbuilders like Boston Boatworks.

For more information, read “Plant tour: BeSpline/Addcomp, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.”

Figure 3. This method uses a preheated sheet of core placed into a matched die set in a press to thermoform the core. Source | Airex Processing Guidelines

Used to form complex shapes to close tolerances, compression molding uses a heated metal matched die set installed in a low-pressure press. The foam sheet is heated to its forming temperature for the proper amount of time, prior to placement in the die. This is done with a multi-zone hot air oven placed directly in line with the press. The core is then cooled to a stable temperature prior to removal from the die (Fig. 3).

Before attempting a full-blown thermoforming process, it is recommended that the reader experiment with the actual core materials (type, density and thickness) that they intend to use and identify the ideal forming temperature and pressure needed to successfully form their material. This can be done using a scaled-down creep forming setup where the core is supported on blocks, is weighted in the center and is heated until it sags. This will provide a good starting point for developing a formal thermoforming process.

1Airex – available from Baltek Inc. (High Point, N.C., U.S.), https://www.3accorematerials.com/en/

2Last-A-Foam – available from General Plastics Manufacturing Co. (Tacoma Wash. U.S.), www.generalplastics.com

3Rohacell – available from Evonik (Parsippany-Troy Hills, N.J., U.S.), https://performance-foams.evonik.com/en/products-and-solutions/rohacell

GKN Aerospace has spent the last five years developing materials strategies and resin transfer molding (RTM) for an aircraft trailing edge wing spar for the Airbus Wing of Tomorrow program.

Collins Aerospace draws on global team, decades of experience to demonstrate large, curved AFP and welded structures for the next generation of aircraft.

As the advanced air mobility market begins to take shape, market leader Joby Aviation works to industrialize composites manufacturing for its first-generation, composites-intensive, all-electric air taxi.

CMC is expanding, with new fiber production in Europe, faster processes and higher temperature materials enabling applications for industry, hypersonics and New Space.

Challenges with the thermoforming/stamping process and potential solutions addressing the associated parameters and complex material behaviors.

The DOMMINIO project combines AFP with 3D printed gyroid cores, embedded SHM sensors and smart materials for induction-driven disassembly of parts at end of life.